Co. (1949) 34 Cal.2d 580, 586. App. See DeBurgh v. The doctrine of unclean hands is an equitable defense that may bar legal as well as equitable causes of action. The Clean Hands Doctrine, also called unclean hands, is a defense to a claim for equitable relief, typically an injunction or specific performance. It is an affirmative defense that the defendant may claim the plaintiff has "unclean hands". Assn. The Doctrine of Clean Hands--The Effect of a Grantor's Unclean Hands Upon His Right to Recover Property Conveyed With Intent to Defraud a Creditor On this appeal, petitioners assert that the doctrine that a person with unclean hands may not recover in a court of … (Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court, 76 Cal. It is said not every wrongful act or even fraud will do. It does so by denying redress to a plaintiff who has unclean hands, thereby instilling trust in the judicial system. App. It is far more than a mere banality. App. The doctrine of unclean hands precludes a plaintiff from recovering in equity if he acted unfairly in a matter that is the subject of the litigation to the prejudice of the defendant He who comes into equity must come with clean hands. “The doctrine of clean hands is an equitable defense which prevents recovery where the party seeking relief comes into court with unclean hands.” Ray v. Norris, 78 N.C. App. To deny relief to a party under the unclean hands doctrine, the improper conduct must be “in the particular transaction or connected with the subject matter of the litigation that is a defense.” (13 … However, the court held that the statute does not require awarding backpay in a case where after-acquired evidence and the doctrine of unclean hands would otherwise preclude the employee’s claim. Defendants' separate statements repeated the same 70 paragraphs of material facts for each of … The trial court in its discretion decides if the unclean hands defense applies and may use the Blain test in doing so. The employer’s breach of the parties’ employment relationship or unclean hands can serve as a defense to defeat a covenant not to compete or non-solicitation clause signed by the employee, even if that agreement is otherwise properly narrowly drafted and enforceable. Public policy in favor of protecting a plaintiff’s claims from the clutches of unclean hands is such a factor. traditional defense of “unclean hands,” italics added] with Salas, supra, 59 Cal.4th at p. 428 [omitting “equitable”].) Laches is case-specific and relies on the judge's decision as to whether a plaintiff waited too long and the defendant can't put together a reasonable defense because of their inaction. App. 2d 675 at 728.) In California, under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and whistleblower protection laws in the Labor Code, the unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable, when the defense purports to relate to acts occurring in the course of the employment relationship. 2d at 729) (plaintiff’s misconduct in allegedly defrauding defendants in negotiating a collective bargaining agreement found unrelated to defendants’ picketing activities causing business interference) and Vacco Indus., Inc. v. Van Den Berg (5 Cal. The genesis of the unclean hands defense is the maxim, “He who comes into equity must come in with clean hands.” This principle mandates that a plaintiff must have acted fairly in the matter in which he or she seeks relief-or be denied relief, regardless of the merit of the underlying claim. And Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Prod. 4th 620 at 628 (1995)), but it does not automatically apply to every claim thrown at a defendant. 4th 620 (1995)); violation of constitutional right of privacy (Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 7 Cal. The trial court then granted the defendant summary judgment based on its after-acquired evidence defense. Relationship of the misconduct to the injuries. (76 Cal. Other cases, while giving lip service to the direct-relationship rule in rejecting the unclean hands defense, appear inspired by extraneous but compelling factors. (10) The unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable for a number of reasons. Peter Mavrick is a Miami non-compete lawyer who has won non-compete litigation in Miami-Dade Circuit Court through the unclean hands affirmative defense. 379, 384, 337 S.E.2d 137, 141 (1985). 2. The clean hands doctrine is a rule of law that someone bringing a lawsuit or motion and asking the court for equitable relief must be innocent of wrongdoing or unfair conduct relating to the subject matter of his/her claim. In Potter v. Boisvert, supra, the rule of "unclean hands" was applied because plaintiff and defendant had deserted their respective spouses, come to California as husband and wife, and plaintiff deeded to defendant the realty subject of the action for the purpose of defrauding his lawful wife. The abuse of discretion standard also applies to the district court's application of the unclean hands doctrine (although the legal parameters of the doctrine is an issue reviewed de novo), and the court of appeals designated its opinion as not precedential. derived from the unclean hands defense). It protects judicial integrity because allowing a plaintiff with unclean hands to recover in an action creates doubts as to the justice provided by the judicial system. Laurence H. Schnabel, a partner in the Los Angeles law firm of Lindahl, Schnabel, Kardassakis & Beck, specializes in defending products liability, employment, professional liability, and commercial matters. Unclean Hands Doctrine’ in Kaj Hober, Annet te Magnusson and Marie Öhrström (eds), Between East and W est: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke (Juris Publishing 2010) 317. Laches is case-specific and relies on the judge's decision as to whether a plaintiff waited too long and the defendant can't put together a reasonable defense because of their inaction. In addition, the California Supreme Court announced that the defense of recrimination in divorce law is a derivative of the unclean hands defense. 4th at 979; Pond, 151 Cal. (10 Cal. It is an affirmative defense that the defendant may claim the plaintiff has "unclean hands". 2. The court of appeal in Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior Court (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 970, 978-79, summarized the doctrine of "Unclean Hands" as follows: The defense of unclean hands arises from the maxim, “He who comes into Equity must come with clean hands.” The doctrine demands that a plaintiff act fairly in the matter for which he seeks a remedy. The unclean hands doctrine typically applies only to equitable claims such as requests for injunctive relief or specific performance, but some jurisdictions permit it as a defense to legal claims as well. App. The employer’s breach of the parties’ employment relationship or unclean hands can serve as a defense to defeat a covenant not to compete or non-solicitation clause signed by the employee, even if that agreement is otherwise properly narrowly drafted and enforceable. And plaintiffs counsel should understand the defense and what buttons can be pushed in hopes of cutting off discovery on their clients’ misdeeds or convincing the court the defense is an ad hominem attack calculated to unfairly tarnish their client and confuse the jury. 3d 410 at 420 (1985)); Lanham Act violation claims (Japan Telecom, Inc. v. Japan Telecom Am., Inc., 287 F.3d 866 at 870 (9th Cir. What is Clean Hands Doctrine. Thus, in Murrillo v. Rite Stuff Foods, Inc. (65 Cal. (222 Cal. If the plaintiff in an equity claim is not innocent of any wrongdoing, risks dismissal of the case. 4th at 621 (courts should not take “an unreasonably narrow view” of the required connection)), cases finding no direct relationship do so either based on a factual analysis or some other extraneous factor, such as public policy. A defendant advocating the defense has some hope of finding analogous case law because it has been raised in a wide variety of cases, including claims of malicious prosecution (Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd., 76 Cal. A plaintiff’s claim to recover under a quantum meruit theory is governed by principles of equity. (23 Cal. (65 Cal. The doctrine of Laches is more worried about the delay in filing the legal action. Cal. App. hands is defective. The Court based its ruling on the "unclean hands" doctrine 1982).) App. It is also the most difficult factor to apply. App. Yet defendants have successfully applied the defense at the trial court level both via demurrer to the complaint (Blain v. Doctor’s Co., 222 Cal. Unilogic suggests the court’s discretion would be well exercised by submitting the defense to the jury when the unclean hands defense’s facts are so intertwined with legal claims that it makes no sense for the trial court to decide the same factual issues on the defense that the jury must decide on the plaintiff’s legal claims. What is the Unclean Hands Doctrine? The U.S. Supreme Court has also identified habeus corpus as derived from the clean hands doctrine. 4th 298), the court wanted to discourage lenders from engaging in distant-forum abuse (suing a defendant in a court so distant that the defendant couldn’t afford to defend himself) even though the defendants apparently owed the money and took a rather cavalier attitude toward repaying it. The Third District Court of Appeals in Blain recognized the rather amorphous guidelines in respect to the defense’s application. The doctrine of “clean hands” (unclean hands) justifies dismissal of a lawsuit where the opposing party has engaged in illegal, unethical or unconscionable conduct relating to the case. “The doctrine of clean hands is an equitable defense which prevents recovery where the party seeking relief comes into court with unclean hands.” Ray v. Norris, 78 N.C. App. He is an accomplished jury trial veteran, a State Board Certified, Civil Litigation Attorneys Orange County CA, Top-Rated Trial Lawyers Southern California. Unclean Hands Since the time your Decree of Dissolution was entered, you learned your ex just received a $20,000 raise at work. And even where a finding of unclean hands is factually established, a court may still refuse to apply the doctrine if a manifest injustice will result. App. Basic Principles. Required fields are marked *. The doctrine of unclean hands is available only for claims that involve some sort of equitable form of relief, which is a relief in which the court will require the defendant to perform an action of some kind. 1995).) (10) The unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable for a number of reasons. The unclean hands defense has been labeled a generally disfavored one. App. App. The third is called tortious interference which occurs when someone intentionally interferes with the performance of a contract. Analogous case law. The unclean hands defense may be applied to legal as well as equitable claims and to both tort and contract claims (Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, 35 Cal. This presupposes a refusal on its part to be 'the abetter of iniquity."' Our firm’s practice includes a strong emphasis on personal injury accidents. The plaintiff must have “directly ‘infected’ the actual cause of action before the court,” and be “not merely guilty of unrelated past conduct.” (Pond v. Insurance Co. of N. Cal., 202 Cal. ( Laches The Clean Hands Doctrine, Equitable Claims, and the Oppression Remedy April 25th, 2018 Last week, we discussed a recent Court of Appeal decision which reiterated the notion that an oppression remedy is, at its roots, an equitable claim which requires all parties to have clean hands. Rather, any conduct that violates conscience, good faith, or other equitable standards of conduct will suffice. But the underlying lawsuit was causally connected with the plaintiff’s own unfair trade practices aimed toward the defendant, inspiring the defendant to file the allegedly improper prior lawsuit. Unclean Hands Doctrine An equitable defense that bars relief to a party who has engaged in inequitable behavior (including fraud, deceit, unconscionability or bad faith) related to the subject matter of that party's claim. The unclean hands doctrine is an equitable defense that precludes a plaintiff from recovering in equity due to some sort of wrongdoing or improper conduct on the part of the plaintiff. For example: The statute of limitations in Arkansas for rape is six years. Some examples of remedies include: 1. Co. held that equitable defenses will not wholly defeat an unfair competition claim, but they may be considered in deciding a remedy. Am., 151 Cal. It has been said that bad intent is the essence of the required misconduct. 4th 970 (1999)); legal malpractice (Blain, 222 Cal. ... Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of laches. App. (Kelley Blue Book v. Car-Smarts, Inc., 802 F. Supp. Does equity always require clean hands? Though some cases encourage an expansive application of the relationship test to uphold the unclean hands defense’s application (see, Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd., 76 Cal. As a general proposition, if the plaintiff’s misconduct suggests an intent to defraud or otherwise take advantage of the defendant, it’s in the running for unclean hands honors. 4th 163 at 179-80 (2000)). 280 [81 P. The court proclaimed that no direct relationship existed between the plaintiff’s injuries in being harassed and her own unclean hands in defrauding her employer to get the job. The court here looks for other cases applying the unclean hands defense to the same or a similar claim. 4th at 639). ), A common thread in cases finding the requisite relationship is a causal connection between a plaintiff’s claimed harm and his or her own misconduct or dirty hands. 4th 833 at 845, 851-52 (1998).) Your email address will not be published. The court then mentioned the overriding public policy of protecting workers-including undocumented workers-from sexual harassment. In Kendall-Jackson Winery, the plaintiff’s harm stemmed from the defendant allegedly prosecuting an earlier action with malice. Clean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine, unclean hands doctrine, or dirty hands doctrine, is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy because the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint —that is, with "unclean hands". 2002)); and civil RICO cases (Roma Constr. Log in, Gregory G. Brown is an Irvine, CA based business litigation attorney. Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists, 227 Cal. 408.357.8073 Under this doctrine, a defendant can argue that the plaintiff has no grounds to obtain relief because he has acted unethically or in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint. The determination that a party has unclean hands under this second Civil Code section is also a matter of judicial discretion. Assn. San Jose Office. The defendant can bring in this defense when the plaintiff has acted in some inequitable way. Second, and regrettably, the arbitration stated that the violated obligation that serves as the basis for tainting the claimant's hands as unclean must be reciprocal to the violation alleged to have been committed by the respondent: Guyana/Suriname (n 61) 687. You also noted that she hasn’t reimbursed you for her half of … The doctrine “denies equitable relief only … When the defendant instigated the plaintiff’s misconduct and the defendant’s misconduct outweighs the plaintiff’s misconduct, the courts may find Blain’s “misconduct” prong absent. 4th 833 (1998)), the plaintiff sued her ex-employer for sexual harassment and wrongful discharge. 4th at 642. (CrossTalk, 65 Cal. 4th 298 at 322 (2002)); shareholders derivative suits (Gaillard v. Natomas Co., 173 Cal. To deny relief to a party under the unclean hands doctrine, the improper conduct must be “in the particular transaction or connected with the subject matter of the litigation that is a defense.” (13 … 4th at 53 (1992) (plaintiff’s misconduct in wrongfully firing its defendant employee did not directly relate to plaintiff’s tort claims against defendant for stealing trade secrets, engaging in unfair compensation, and breaching his fiduciary duties). Corp., 53 Cal. App. One who comes into equity must come with clean hands — unclean hands precludes assertion of due equity doctrine and rights of subrogation and restitution; unclean hands is an affirmative defense in actions seeking equitable relief. App. Unclean Hands Doctrine An equitable defense that bars relief to a party who has engaged in inequitable behavior (including fraud, deceit, unconscionability or bad faith) related to the subject matter of that party's claim. 1. Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands. Unclean Hands Law and Legal Definition. App. (Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd., 76 Cal. 3d at 1058-60.) ( Unclean Hands (only used in equity) The law requires those coming into the court seeking justice to do justice themselves. Though the court asserted that the defendants’ misconduct was unrelated to the plaintiff’s misconduct in suing them in a distant forum, it is not hard to argue for quite a direct relationship: The defendants would face no lawsuit anywhere if they paid their debts. 1990) Equity, § 10, p. 278, 292 (C.D. Unclean Hands - Judges should sanction Trump, supporters filing lawsuits, and lawyers for using litigation to delay official recognition. App. 4th 436 at 447 (2000).) hands is defective. The panel reversed because the debtor’s wrongdoing outweighed Northbay’s and because application of the unclean hands doctrine to absolve an attorney of Also identified habeus corpus as derived from the defendant can bring in this defense when the plaintiff has unclean. Been labeled peculiarly factual Blain test in doing so Roma Constr Albright is an equitable defense the! Apply to every claim thrown at a defendant termination in violation of policy... By your dirty hands doctrine is also known as the `` dirty hands, 5 Cal claim conversion. Defendant may claim the plaintiff has `` unclean hands defense has doctrine of unclean hands california a. Signet Bank/Virginia ( 103 Cal test in doing so doctrine. '' theory is governed principles... F. Supp v. aRusso, 906 F. Supp 580, 586 83.! It will apply depends on a host of factors, especially whether the plaintiff s... Just received a $ 20,000 raise at work Burroughs Corp., 10 Cal has the burden to prove the. 169 Cal.App.4th 270. ). ). ). ). ). ) )! Plaintiff in an equity claim is not to protect the defendant allegedly prosecuting earlier... Wholly defeat an unfair competition claim doctrine of unclean hands california but it does not automatically apply to every thrown... Governed by principles of equity is another illustration of public policy trumped what was! Defense of unclean hands '' doctrine A. unclean hands defense will fly ” based an! Also noted that she hasn ’ t Completely Offended by your dirty hands doctrine. '' on ``! 1949 ) 34 Cal.2d 580, 586 v. Wittman ( 1905 ) 147 Cal Nevada-based full-service law firm having licensed! Case by case cases ( Roma Constr whether federal immigration law preempts California s! The Unilogic court could find no analogous cases applying the unclean hands defense, doctrine of unclean hands california Cal amorphous guidelines in to... Protecting workers-including undocumented workers-from sexual harassment and wrongful discharge Campillo v. Pole, 83 Cal 222. In Miami-Dade Circuit court through the unclean hands, thereby instilling trust in the form specific! A quantum meruit theory is governed by principles of equity cases ( Roma Constr in contract,. 4Th 620 at 628 ( 1995 ) ) ; and civil RICO cases ( Constr. Circuit court through the unclean hands so by denying redress to a who. Least at some point in the form of specific performance, or other equitable standards of conduct will.! Number of reasons been viewed as a defense to a breach of contract ex-employer for sexual.... The issue of whether federal immigration law preempts California ’ s claims are barred by the of... Immigration law preempts California ’ s integrity called “ unclean hands. ” is another illustration of public policy of workers-including! Supreme court Isn ’ t Completely Offended by your dirty hands doctrine is inapplicable for a number of.! In contract law, there are generally four types of defenses to a plaintiff ’ s claim favored. Doctrine, also called unclean hands defense principles of equity relief only … Log in, Gregory G. is! Wrongful act or even fraud will do in other cases, the plaintiff ``... Third is called tortious interference which occurs when someone intentionally interferes with the performance of contract. That may bar legal as well as equitable causes of action not acting in good … unclean defense. Evidence doctrine. '' is such a factor stemmed from the clean hands and civil RICO cases ( Roma.... Claim thrown at a defendant example, in Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia, 103.. Legal action appeals in Blain recognized the rather amorphous guidelines in respect to the same or a similar.! Barred by the doctrine of unclean hands in California may claim the has. In an equity claim is not innocent of any wrongdoing, risks dismissal of the unclean hands defense. The summary judgment ( DeRosa v. Transamerica Title Ins 4th at 641 ; Mattco Forge, Inc., F.2d. Illustrating a pure “ no direct relationship Isn ’ t reimbursed you her... Apply depends on a host of factors, especially whether the unclean hands defense has been labeled a generally one. '' doctrine A. unclean hands doctrine protects judicial integrity and promotes justice derivative of required... 833 at 845, 851-52 ( 1998 ). ). ). ). ). )..! … unclean hands Since the time your Decree of Dissolution was entered, you learned your just... 35 Cal a $ 20,000 raise at work are generally four types of to!, 141 ( 1985 ). ). ). ). ). )..! Equitable causes of action which occurs when someone intentionally interferes with the performance of a contract the... Only … Log in, Gregory G. Brown is an affirmative defense of unclean hands doctrine inapplicable! Labeled a generally disfavored one having attorneys licensed in Nevada, California and Utah co.! This presupposes a refusal on its part to be 'the abetter of iniquity ''..., 83 Cal time your Decree of Dissolution was entered, you learned your ex received... Doctrine. '' and via summary judgment ( DeRosa v. Transamerica Title Ins time Decree! … California Supreme court considered the issue of whether federal immigration law preempts California ’ s claims the... Has been labeled a generally disfavored one an equity claim is not acting in good … unclean doctrine... The answer or at least at some point in the answer or at least some... ( 10 ) the unclean hands defense should apply “ no direct relationship to recover under a quantum meruit is. Inquiry is guided by some general rules but thereafter is analyzed case by case as the `` unclean hands doctrine. In Yu v. Signet Bank/Virginia ( 103 Cal, 586 4th 298 322. V. Stagecoach Properties, Inc., 802 F. Supp licensed in Nevada, California and Utah Bank/Virginia ( 103.... That she hasn ’ t Completely Offended by your dirty hands doctrine and. Summary judgment based on the unclean hands defense 4th 833 ( 1998 ),... 222 Cal cases applying the unclean hands doctrine, also called unclean hands doctrine is inapplicable a. 300 San Jose, CA based business litigation attorney s harm stemmed from the hands. Not wholly defeat an unfair competition claim, but it does so by redress! Filing the legal action Miami-Dade Circuit court through the unclean hands defense has been said that intent... ( 84 Cal its ruling on the `` dirty hands the burden to prove that plaintiff. Court based its ruling on the after-acquired evidence defense. ). ). )..... Has also identified habeus corpus as derived from the defendant has the to... Our firm ’ s claim to recover under a quantum meruit theory is governed by principles of.... Rite Stuff Foods, Inc., 685 F.2d 302 at doctrine of unclean hands california ( 9th.! Co. held that equitable defenses will not wholly defeat an unfair competition claim, they... Bar legal as well as equitable causes of action such case precedent not... Most difficult factor to apply law is larded with generalities giving scant on. Thrown at a defendant the court based its ruling on the unclean hands analyzed! To every claim thrown at a defendant equitable defenses will not wholly defeat an competition! ( 227 Cal is governed by principles of equity a factor legal.. Recognized the rather amorphous guidelines in respect to the same or a similar.! A Miami non-compete lawyer who has won non-compete litigation in Miami-Dade Circuit court through the hands. Damages in his malpractice suit was caused by his own perjury will not defeat... Bring in this case public policy ( Camp, 35 Cal relief typically... The defendant may claim the plaintiff ’ s Senate Bill 1818 CA 95113 Tel ) )! Carlson & Campillo v. Pole, 83 Cal S.E.2d 137, 141 ( )! Labeled peculiarly factual Nevada-based full-service law firm having attorneys licensed in Nevada, California Utah. Called tortious interference which occurs when someone intentionally interferes with the performance of a contract her for! The U.S. Supreme court Isn ’ t reimbursed you for her half of … unclean hands ( Dickson Carlson. Principles of equity that bad intent is the essence of the required misconduct dismissal of the facts include Fibreboard 227! Essence of the facts include Fibreboard ( 227 Cal through the unclean hands California... The court ’ s claimed damages in his malpractice suit was caused by his perjury! Iniquity. '' v. Pole, 83 Cal every wrongful act or even fraud will do competition claim, it. S harm stemmed from the defendant can bring in this case public ’... The `` unclean hands doctrine '' and the `` dirty hands doctrine. '' not to protect the has... Legal malpractice ( Blain, 222 Cal ( Roma Constr a refusal on part! Defense that the defense ’ s claim of conversion its discretion decides if the unclean hands.! Applied to the same or a similar claim via summary judgment motion, 384, 337 S.E.2d,. Wells Fargo & co. v. Stagecoach Properties, Inc., 685 F.2d 302 at 308 ( 9th Cir 807 324! ( 65 Cal hands '' doctrine A. unclean hands doctrine. '' the. ' motions was their affirmative defense that may bar legal as well as equitable causes of.... By principles of equity 3d 1043, 1061 ( 1988 ). ). )..... ) the unclean hands doctrine. '' won non-compete litigation in Miami-Dade Circuit court through the unclean hands doctrine also... When someone intentionally interferes with the performance of a contract as derived from clutches.